Thermophysiological comfort plays a pivotal role in maintaining body temperature balance and overall well-being, particularly in various environmental conditions. This article explores the key factors affecting thermophysiological comfort, emphasizing the interplay between physiological factors, microclimate layers, clothing properties, ambient conditions, and body movement.
1. Physiological Characteristics and Processes
Physiological traits such as age, sex, and body composition significantly impact thermophysiological comfort.
- Age: As individuals age, their ability to regulate temperature diminishes. Older individuals tend to produce less metabolic heat, which makes them more comfortable in higher ambient temperatures.
- Sex: Research indicates that women generally produce less metabolic heat than men, which may make them feel colder in similar conditions due to lower muscle mass and heat production.
- Body Composition: Body fat serves as insulation, aiding in thermoregulation, particularly in colder environments. However, in hot conditions, higher fat levels may impede heat dissipation, leading to discomfort.
2. Microclimate Layer
The microclimate refers to the thin layer of air between the skin and clothing that directly affects heat and moisture transfer.
- Heat Transfer: A thin microclimate layer (under 12 mm) limits natural convection, leading to higher thermal resistance. A thicker layer (over 12 mm) promotes natural convection, enhancing heat and moisture transfer.
- Heterogeneous Microclimates: Variations in fabric structure, such as folds, create different microclimates that aid in heat dissipation by enhancing airflow.
3. Clothing Properties
Clothing properties play a crucial role in thermophysiological comfort, with yarn and fabric characteristics affecting heat and moisture regulation.
Yarn Properties
Yarn properties, such as linear density, fiber content, twist, and tightness, significantly influence thermophysiological comfort.
- Linear Density: Fineness of yarns affects thermal resistance and moisture transport. Finer yarns, as studied, were found to trap less air, leading to lower thermal resistance. However, they also enhance water-vapor permeability due to the creation of open channels for moisture transport.
- Fiber Content: Fiber type (hydrophilic vs. hydrophobic) plays a key role in moisture management. Blended fibers, such as cotton and bamboo, can improve performance in warm conditions by enhancing air and water-vapor permeability.
- Yarn Twist: Increased yarn twist reduces void spaces, lowering thermal resistance but enhancing water-vapor permeability. Higher twists result in reduced insulation, making fabrics more breathable.
- Spinning Techniques: The spinning process also affects thermal properties. For example, ring-spun yarns, which undergo multiple refining steps, produce finer yarns with better thermal comfort properties. Air jet spinning, which focuses on speed, creates bulkier yarns, increasing thermal insulation by trapping air within the fabric.
Fabric Properties
Fabric properties, including thickness, weight, structure, and surface finish, greatly influence thermal and moisture management.
- Fabric Thickness: Thicker fabrics provide higher thermal resistance but can impede water-vapor transmission. Studies show a positive correlation between fabric thickness and thermal resistance, while water-vapor transmission decreases with increased thickness.
- Fabric Weight: Heavier fabrics absorb more sweat, making them suitable for environments requiring high moisture absorption.
- Fabric Structure and Porosity: Looser fabric structures with lower counts provide higher air and water-vapor permeability due to increased porosity. Satin and twill structures, for instance, offer better moisture management compared to plain weaves due to fewer yarn interlacements.
- Surface Finish: Chemical and mechanical finishes can modify fabric properties to enhance comfort. Chemical finishes like hydrophilic treatments improve moisture-wicking, while mechanical finishes like raising create fleecy surfaces, enhancing thermal insulation.
4. Ambient Conditions
Environmental factors such as air temperature, humidity, and wind directly affect thermophysiological comfort.
- Temperature and Humidity: High humidity reduces sweat evaporation, making the body feel warmer. Conversely, low humidity in colder conditions can lead to excessive heat loss and discomfort.
- Air Velocity: Increased air velocity enhances heat dissipation by promoting sweat evaporation and convection.
5. Body Movement
Physical activity influences heat generation and sweat production, affecting thermophysiological comfort.
- Pumping Effect: Movement causes forced convection within the clothing microclimate, reducing thermal insulation. Studies show a 75% reduction in thermal insulation due to this effect, which is exacerbated by higher air velocities and certain body shapes.
- Ventilation Effect: Body movement and external wind can cause ventilation through fabric pores, further influencing heat and moisture transfer.
Conclusion
Thermophysiological comfort is a complex balance influenced by human physiology, clothing properties, environmental conditions, and body movement. Understanding these factors helps in designing textiles that provide optimal comfort across a variety of environments, whether through yarn and fabric modifications or by considering ambient conditions and activity levels.
References
1. Islam, M.R.; Golovin, K.; Dolez, P.I. Clothing Thermophysiological Comfort: A Textile Science Perspective. Textiles 2023, 3, 353–407. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles3040024.
2. Angelova, R.A. Textiles and Human Thermophysiological Comfort in the Indoor Environment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017.[CrossRef]
3. Ding, D.; Tang, T.; Song, G.; McDonald, A. Characterizing the Performance of a Single-Layer Fabric System through a Heat and
Mass Transfer Model—Part I: Heat and Mass Transfer Model. Text. Res. J. 2011, 81, 398–411. [CrossRef]
4. Joshi, A.; Wang, F.; Kang, Z.; Yang, B.; Zhao, D. A Three-Dimensional Thermoregulatory Model for Predicting Human Thermophysiological Responses in Various Thermal Environments. Build. Environ. 2022, 207, 108506. [CrossRef]
5. Havenith, G.; Fiala, D. Thermal Indices and Thermophysiological Modeling for Heat Stress. Compr. Physiol. 2015, 6, 255–302. [PubMed]
6. Havenith, G. Heat Balance When Wearing Protective Clothing. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 1999, 43, 296–298. [CrossRef]
7. Holmér, I. Protective Clothing in Hot Environments. Ind. Health 2006, 44, 404–413. [CrossRef]
8. Havenith, G.; Hartog, E.A.D.; Martini, S. Heat Stress in Chemical Protective Clothing: Porosity and Vapour Resistance. Ergonomics 2011, 54, 497–507. [CrossRef]
9. Holmér, I. Protective Clothing and Heat Stress. Ergonomics 1995, 38, 166–182. [CrossRef]
10. Parsons, K.C. Human Thermal Environments; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2002.
11. Parsons, K.C. Human Thermal Comfort; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2020.